« Council Presentation a Success | Main | »

05 april 2006

Late-Breaking News, Text of Council Presentation

THE YPSI CITY COUNCIL has agreed to ask AATA for a fare increase to $1.25. This reduces the proposed bus subsidy cut to a measly $28,500. I see the light at the end of the tunnel. It's the headlights of the #3, coming to take me to work next year.

Text of council presentation in "Continue Reading".

City Council Presentation

My name is Laura Bien. I’m the head of a citizens’ action group called “Keep Ypsi Rolling,” which is working to preserve bus service in Ypsilanti. Let me tell you the problem and the 3 possible solutions we’ve come up with to preserve bus service in Ypsilanti.

As you know, Ypsilanti is in terrible financial shape. The City Council is considering a set of 3-year budget cuts. The city pays $170,000 to the AATA every year for bus service. The budget cuts recommend that in fiscal year 2007, the bus subsidy be reduced by $82,000. This would mean that bus routes 3 and 5 would not come to downtown Ypsilanti. Then, in 2008, the cuts recommend that the bus subsidy be reduced to zero. This would eliminate all bus service to Ypsilanti.

Annually, there are 524,955 bus boardings in Ypsilanti, on routes 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, & 20. 524,955 annual rides from Ypsi is 1,438 rides every day. Many daily riders, like me, don’t have a car or any other option to get to work, child care, or school. You can imagine the bad effects resulting from eliminating the bus. It would cripple an already struggling city. We can’t allow this to happen. Let me tell you about 3 solutions to save the bus service.

None of these solutions is perfect. Not everyone will like them. But a workable, practical solution, even though imperfect, is better than no bus service at all.

SOLUTION 1: BUDGET READJUSTMENT

[Visual aid: chart #1]

One item in the recommended budget cuts for 2007 is the reduction of the bus subsidy by $82,000. This would eliminate routes 3 and 5 from coming to downtown Ypsi. Routes 3 and 5 have 135,360 Ypsi boardings annually.

If we look further down the budget list, we see that there are items in fiscal years 2008 and 2009 that could be moved to 2007. This would save enough money to keep routes 3 and 5.

For example, three 2008 cuts are $44,000 for recreation, $17,500 for special events, and $17,500 for Planning and Development interns. Together, these amount to $79,000. If we move these line items up to 2007, it would fund most of the suggested $82,000 bus subsidy cut.

Another example: one suggested cut in 2009 is $43,000 for a city lobbyist. This cut could also be moved to 2007, because a city lobbyist would have a pretty tough time lobbying for businesses to move to a city without any public transportation.

No one wants to see cuts in recreation or special events. But if it’s a question of going to the beer festival for one weekend, so to speak, or ensuring reliable transportation for half a million bus rides from Ypsi annually, I think the choice is clear.

SOLUTION 2: FARE INCREASE AND BUDGET READJUSTMENT

[Visual aid: chart #2]

The AATA has worked with the City to suggest some service changes that would save money. For example, the AATA is willing to make a fare increase, likely at the end of August 2006, to $1.25 system-wide. This would raise $53,500 for Ypsi, dropping the proposed 2007 cut of $82,000 to only $28,500. This $28,500 could be made up by the kinds of budget adjustments I suggested before. Moving special events and planning and development intern cuts to 2007 totals $35,000 and would mean the subsidy would not have to be cut in the short term.


SOLUTION 3: FARE INCREASE AND ADJUST ROUTE #5

[Visual aid: chart #3]

My last solution combines the fare increase, totaling $53,500, which drops the proposed 2007 cut of $82,000 to only $28,500, with a small reduction in service on route 5. For much of its length within greater Ypsi, the 5 is parallel to route 4. In a way, it’s a bit redundant to route 4. If we cut bus service slightly, by stopping the 5 at Golfside or Hewitt, most riders would walk an average of .2 miles to transfer to or from the 4 to continue their ride. This cut would raise $26,000, canceling out most of the remaining $28,500 we owe the AATA. In a perfect world, we wouldn’t cut any bus service at all, or any city budget items. In what we’ve got, an imperfect, workable solution preserves something vital to our community.

LONG-TERM SOLUTION FOR STABLE BUS FUNDING: MILLAGE

The solutions I outlined are short-term solutions, because the problems are immediate and urgent. In the long term, AATA is thinking about sponsoring a millage, covering its entire service area, that would secure long-term bus service to Ypsi. The millage would come, at the earliest, at the end of 2007. Our job is to get to that point with short-term, immediate solutions like these, and then work together to successfully pass a millage to ensure stable long-term funding for a service vital to our community.

Posted by ypsidixit at 05 april 2006 00:18

Comments

Told you I was a night owl. Gracious, time for bed!

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 00:24

Laura, great work tonight at the meeting (I was the guy talking about Habitat for Humanity before you) You really had very strong arguments, and presented very effectively. I am glad that there is someone standing up for not only your bus service, but for all of us EMU students who use the bus system frequently.

Thanks, great work, and congratulations on a successful campaign thus far!

Posted by: Michael Haynes at 05 april 2006 00:37

Mr. Haynes: Thank you for your kind words. Please know that I am only the bullhorn, as it were, for the unrecognized efforts of now hundreds of community members devoting work to this campaign. I just distilled their thoughts into the presentation, and was thankful to be the person to do so.

I thought your H for H project was very laudable. If someone would like to contribute money, is there a website or email? You mentioned one, but I was chatting with another community member and I didn't write it down--please excuse me.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 00:56

The highlight of the council meeting, however, was the presentation on a subject near and dear to Y.'s heart, URBAN CHICKENS.

The presenter presented persuasive arguments as to why Ypsilantians should amend the whatever and allow URBAN CHICKENS.

Dang nab it, it's enough to make me want to move into Ypsi proper, instead of being a townshipper.

Let's make like Flint, whose rabbit-meat-raiser was famously profiled in Michael Moore's film, and start the Ypsilanti backyard chicken industry!

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 00:59

Here's a promise. If Ypsi agrees to allow URBAN CHICKENS, I'll pull up stakes and move into the city. Yes, sir, I will. My valuable if paltry tax dollars will stream into Ypsilanti's spiderwebbed coffers if the gentlefolk guiding our rapidly sinking ship allow URBAN CHICKENS.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 01:03

Hey...Go easy on Flint....Its reputation is bad....and Saginaw Street is much the same as it was in ' Rodger and Me ' but there are alot of good folks who live there and they don't eat rabbit....but the rabbit hunting is great just outside Flint....

Posted by: CRR at 05 april 2006 02:49

"If Ypsi agrees to allow URBAN CHICKENS, I'll pull up stakes and move into the city"

I have only been following the bus thing through your blog, so I don't fully comprehend the whole issue, but has anyone approached the township about kicking in some money for AATA?

Posted by: Hamilton at 05 april 2006 08:46

CRR: You're right. I think Moore kinda harped on the rabbit woman. But she's there, nonetheless. I'm sure Flint and Ypsi have a great deal in common.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 08:58

I really liked the urban chicken idea, as well. The chicken guy talked about how Ypsi originally decided to ban urban chickens in the 1950s because people thought the chickens would be happier in the country. He cleverly juxtaposed this concept with a picture of chickens crammed together in a factory farm today.

Posted by: Ingrid at 05 april 2006 08:59

Hamilton, welcome to the blog. Don't recall seeing your name.

No, the city has not approached the Twp., which has plenty of cash. It's worth noting that the 10, 11, and 20 would be useless if there were no buses coming into the downtown. But the Twp. already pays its own POSA that is even more than Ypsi's: $175,877 as opposed to Ypsi's $170,504.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 09:01

Ingrid,
The urban chicken presentation was completely charming. I've read about the "tractors" he showed, the moveable chicken houses. They are good for the earth; chicken poo is very rich in nitrogen. You can move them around your yard.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 09:02

Sounds like the meeting went great! Sorry I wasn't there to share in the glory, but at least I can read about it. I think this really is a testament to what a community can do. I say community organizing is alive and well and we witnessed it right here in our community! It's really great that we can show people that they can make a difference, even when the issue seems a bit daunting. I applaud everyone who has helped make this happen and just feel so proud to live in this area!

Posted by: Nancy at 05 april 2006 09:18

The offer to move into the City if Ypsi allows urban chickens is nothing more than a cheep rhetorical ploy. I'd be more impressed if you offered to change the name of the blog to Ypsi-Chixit or Ypsi-Chicks-It. ;-)==

Nice work by KYR at Council.

Posted by: HD at 05 april 2006 09:19

Nancy, the meeting went well. There were at least 175-200 people there I'd say. I was terribly nervous until I thought of the trick of regarding the whole room as one of my classes (I used to be a teacher). That worked.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 09:21

HD, I'd reply but I feel like I'm walking on eggshells. And I don't want to egg you on.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 09:23

Having spent a lot of time in Flint for our group's masters project last semester, I have to say that I'm very impressed with the amount of stuff that's happening there. It's still hurting, and the recent (and coming) plant closings aren't helping matters any, but it's definitely a much more optimistic picture than it was when Moore made his movie. UM-Flint and Kettering are both moving to help downtown, rehabbing some of the historic buildings into student housing and otherwise encouraging their students to move into the city - there are some coffee shops on Saginaw that I've seen packed with students surrounded by their books and laptops. Several empty buildings are being converted into loft space - what would be a $400k condo in Ann Arbor rents for $650 month on Saginaw. There are a couple of major businesses moving back downtown, and there are plans to rehab their historic theater. The Genesee County Land Bank is amazing. So, yeah, just my two cents that Flint is not wholly a downwards comparison.

As for the rabbit-raising woman in the movie, I personally saw her depiction as positive - here she was, finding a way to eke by, and the County comes in and shuts her down

Posted by: Murph at 05 april 2006 09:32

Murph: you're right, it was positive. Ypsi should take a far-sighted view and allow the beneficial effects of URBAN CHICKENS. A city full of happy, clucking chickens! Just imagine it!

I sense another Giant Petition in the pipeline.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 09:34

My valuable if paltry tax dollars will stream into Ypsilanti's spiderwebbed coffers

I meant poultry tax dollars.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 09:42

We need a slogan for this chicken thing. Dang it, I was up till all hours and got up at the crack of...7:19 a.m....and now I'm all fired up again! Articulate and urbane chicken man, whose name I didn't write down, you have a loyal ally here in Ypsichixit!

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 09:43

Keep Ypsi Hatching?

(returns to drawing board)

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 09:44

Murph, I meant to say it sounds like there is a vibrant new streak to Flint. The filled coffeeshops are hopeful, as are the real estate developments.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 09:55

Just build on your successful KYR brand, but change the logo from a bus to an egg.

Meanwhile, I suggest you pick a vacant storefront in downtown and start Ypsi-Chixit as the freshest chicken dinner in the County. Raise chickens on a green roof, with a little periscope in the restaurant so that you can pick your own chicken.

Posted by: Murph at 05 april 2006 09:57

(jaw drops at the brilliance of this idea).

Hey, this could *actually be done*. Set up a local network from Ypsi chicken ranchers for the supply of birds.

And I LOVE the idea of "The 'Pick Your Chick' Periscope." I can just picture it swiveling around.

"I'll take the smiling happy brown one. Kill that one."

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 10:00

Murph: Good idea on the logo. I'll just swap out the green clip art bus and dig up a clip art egg.

Folks, if we get this rolling, we can do a big tie-in at Easter.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 10:03

Ypsichix update: I just heard from a Ypsilantian who emphatically said that she does NOT want chickens next door to her and if any do appear next to her yard, she's heading down to City Hall.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 10:05

I just heard from a Ypsilantian who emphatically said that she does NOT want chickens next door to her and if any do appear next to her yard, she's heading down to City Hall.

And I thought we were waking up from the long nightmare of segregation.

Posted by: Shupac at 05 april 2006 10:17

(bursts out laughing)

Ahem. Yes, you are right on, Shupac. The Ypsichix movement seeks to celebrate the remarkable diversity of our city. There's no room for speciesism here, no sir.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 10:20

The "articulate and urbane chicken man" is my neighbor and long-time Ypsilanti resident, Peter Thomason. I can tell you that all the local children are very excited about the project and hopeful that the ordinance will be changed.

My husband, who attended last night's meeting, said both presentations were very well-done and convincing.

These puns are cracking me up.

Posted by: Amy Doyle at 05 april 2006 10:26

Yes--Mr. Thomason--that's it. Thank you.

Can you imagine all those fresh young hopeful little faces changing from eager, expectant smiles to tear-streaked disappointment?

My God, I'm getting miserable just imagining that.

Won't somebody please think of the children?

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 10:33

I really like the idea of urban chickens. I probably wouldnt keep them because I think my dogs would harass them. Still, it would be nice to have fresh eggs. Also, the baby chicks are pretty cheap as is the chicken feed. That would mean some cheap chicken dinners for a person willing to pluck the feathers.

It is really only the roosters who make a lot of noise and it is a problem that can be easily solved (by a cheap chicken dinner).

Posted by: Lynne at 05 april 2006 10:37

The children are definitely an important part of the Ypsichix restaurant business plan. (p.s. "The pick-your-chick periscope" has an excellent ring to it.) You see, in addition to the restaurant, there will be a "Hands-On Museum"-style section where children can learn first hand the meaning of "running around like a chicken with its head cut off," in addition to receiving valuable lessons in hatchet safety and the opportunity to make their own down pillows.

Hey, it's not child labor if _they_ pay _you_ for it.

Posted by: Murph at 05 april 2006 10:53

The Pick-Your-Chick Periscope! Remember, that was *your* brilliant idea, Murph.

Your other ideas are just wonderful. A fabulous way to teach kids an instructive lesson about the natural cycle of life.

None of this sappy Lion King stuff.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 10:58

Ms. Doyle, may I ask, do you think Mr. Thomason might be convinced to take a second to email me at ypsidixit@gmail.com? Not that he has anything better to do. I'd appreciate it. Thank you.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 11:01

I just called and left him a message.

Posted by: Amy Doyle at 05 april 2006 11:22

Sure, but you _named_ it.

Tell you what - we can share the patent.

Posted by: Murph at 05 april 2006 12:12

Am I the only one picturing all those chicken yards full of chickens with bird flu? I wonder about the timing of this, chicken in such close proximity to humans would not be too prudent, eh?

Posted by: Anonymous at 05 april 2006 12:30

Am I the only one picturing all those chicken yards full of chickens with bird flu? I wonder about the timing of this, chicken in such close proximity to humans would not be too prudent, eh?

Posted by: Anonymous at 05 april 2006 12:31

I put bird flu on my freakin toast in the morning. You're gonna die someday, but not from chickens.

I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees.

Posted by: Anonymous at 05 april 2006 12:58

"Am I the only one picturing all those chicken yards full of chickens with bird flu?"


No, there's at least two of us.

Posted by: brett* at 05 april 2006 13:13

Well, we should start by collecting data on the subject, like this CDC page on avian flu and poultry.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 13:21

More info from here:


A safe home

Allowing poultry to have free access to their environment (roads, stagnant waters, plastic, cats and dogs) is perhaps the most difficult aspect to overcome when attempting to control disease and apply some level of biosecurity. In these cases, biosecurity should commence with making loose chickens truly backyard chickens (not "front-yard" or "under-house" chickens), in a place that they can be observed and properly cared for. Being in a known and comfortable enclosure is also likely to reduce their stress (competition with vehicular traffic and potential predators) and therefore gain weight, lay more eggs, and have less risk for contact with diseased animals.

Conceptually, biosecurity is most successful when a group of neighbours, commercial operators, or villagers practice it.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 13:28

Here's a very informative and helpful page from a group called Bird Flu Beacon:

Hidden Bird Flu Hazards of Backyard Chicken Farms

I hate to mention it because 1. I think bird flu has been blown completely out of proportion and 2. this page totally undermines my dream of backyard chickens, BUT in all fairness, you have to make a decision based not on whimsy but information.

Though I prefer whimsy, dangit.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 13:39

On the other hand, there have been 100 deaths worldwide from bird flu, none in the U.S.

Out of 6.5 billion people, you could argue that this is having an incredibly microscopic, even vanishingly small, if not almost totally insignificant, effect on people as a whole.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 13:42

Bird Flu Threatens American Troops In Iraq: Story

Excerpt: "Bird flu instructions for US troops are reported in the March 3 issue of Stars and Stripes. Soldiers are told to seek medical attention, particularly if they have flu symptoms (fever, cough, sore throat or muscle aches), or an eye infection or difficulty breathing, especially after contact with poultry. They're also told to avoid contact with birds of any kind. In particular, troops are instructed not to handle sick or dead birds, and to even avoid eating poultry originating in Iraq. They are even told to stay away from others who are sick, and to sleep in cots in a foot-to-head pattern with maximum possible distance between cots."

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 13:45

NPR had a story on commercial operators' preparations for bird flu - apparently, they involve things like, "If any case of bird flu is discovered within x distance, all poultry in this five-county area will be slaughtered and burned on site."

I would expect any ordinance allowing urban poultry would similarly involve,
a) a permitting process
b) a requirement that all birds be destroyed within 48 hours of any case of bird flu or similar being discovered within 100 miles of Ypsilanti.

Enforcing part a makes part b enforceable.

Posted by: Murph at 05 april 2006 14:15

(suddenly more hopeful)

Hm. Good idea, Murph. If such safeguards are in place, then that makes the idea of backyard chickens much more palatable to the average person, I'd say.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 14:22

We used to have a mini horse in our city neighborhood that was not zoned for "farm" animals. It was listed as a large dog. The family did move to a farm a few years ago and aquired more horses. I used to drive the kids by to see the horsey daily on the way to preschool.

Posted by: maryd at 05 april 2006 14:24

Mary's given me an idea. How about campaigning for a non-avian backyard food animal? Just spitballing, here.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 14:26

Ypsichix update: The aforementioned community member who was ready to go to City Hall if chickens move in is OK with quail. But not pigeons.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 15:09

Llamas? (I mean - Llamas?)

Posted by: Murph at 05 april 2006 15:49

"Albino Blacksheep": heh.

Being of an analytical turn of mind I must note that some of the relationships between some of the items in the song were...oblique. Potato. Duck. Fresh lemony drink. But I might be overthinking it, for a change. I love the lines "I once was a treehouse, I lived in a cake," though.

Charming.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 15:58

how about emus

Posted by: maryd at 05 april 2006 16:11

I can picture an emu sanctuary, consisting of fencing in Frog Island and Riverside Park. I'm just imagining walking over the Tridge and hearing the approaching thunder of Ypsi's emu herd pounding over the Tridge from Frog Island to Riverside Park.

Emus can pack a punch, however. So I've heard (and are they edible?)

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 16:15

Mary's given me an idea. How about campaigning for a non-avian backyard food animal? Just spitballing, here.

Guinea pigs. They can't climb, they're friendly, and they're already allowed as pets: http://www.abc.net.au/sunshine/stories/s1499675.htm

Posted by: Sandy at 05 april 2006 18:43

I like guinea pigs, have had 'em as pets (they can be LOUD).

They raise them as food animals in South America. Recipe for fried guinea pig (Ayacucho style).

It says "Have cold beer on hand." Yes, I'd think I'd need some to wash this tidbit down.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 18:53

So guinea pig farming (we'll call the meat, um, "free-range garden calflet") is one possibility.

It might have to be a secret guinea pig farm. We don't want to end up with Highland Cemetery disturbed.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 18:59

Maybe i'm a little naive, but...why don't you just encourage people to have gardens on their property?

Posted by: brett* at 05 april 2006 20:33

...and, I should add, as it was recently deleted:


1918

Posted by: brett* at 05 april 2006 20:36

Oops, no, Brett*, didn't delete it, but I've noticed that your comments are, for reasons unknown to me, often flagged by Movable Type and held in a waiting area till I approve them. I was frantic trying to get work done today since I left early today, and I stayed late till 8 p.m. I didn't have time to approve all the comments in the waiting area. I do remember getting the usual email note when you posted the bird flu thing. Didn't realize it'd been flagged. I never delete comments, with one small exception recently with some slanderous comment that some fool was re-posting over and over.

Posted by: Laura at 05 april 2006 22:39

That's fine.

Since, as you've all probably suspected, I'm actually a Spammer operating from an offshore server near Korea, I usually expect to get flagged by blog software.

Now, who wants some \/1aga7a?

Posted by: brett* at 06 april 2006 09:43

Brett*: Wait, now I'm confused. I thought you were purchased by Disney?

Posted by: Laura at 06 april 2006 09:47

Yes, of course we were, on April 1st.

But I still send out spam, just as a hobby. I find it very relaxing.

Posted by: brett* at 06 april 2006 09:51

Brett*: I see. Thanks for the explanation. One wonders if you are not concerned about getting sued, as a Disney-owned spammer. But these complicated business structures are beyond my ken.

Posted by: Laura at 06 april 2006 09:56

(I'm so late at coming into these discussions... grant proposals tend to take over life and all else for chunks of time.)

I saw preliminary plans for the Ypsichickens idea several month ago, and it was at that point about urban livestock overall... which includes bees, chickens, and goats (if there's a certain amount of square footage)... Not sure if the ordinance change Peter is focusing on right now is just for the chickens initially. Part of that initial plan was for a pilot where neighbors would have to approve of your chickens (I've already talked to mine, who, despite having many many dogs, cats, and birds, are okay with me having them)... and that there would be a complaint process. I'm elated that Lois Richardson has gotten on board with it-- she remembers having chickens when she was growing up in Ypsi.

If anyone is interested in seeing model urban chicken/livestock ordinances from other cities, let me know and I can email them to you. Heifer Project International's Urban Ag Program (the regional office that serves us is in Chicago) have been big advocates... And they are being involved in a big urban ag center development in Toledo-- though I haven't been keeping close touch with them lately.

Personally, I'm most interested in urban worm farming-- Heifer considers worms livestock, and Growing Power in Milwaukee has shown how it can be done on a big scale. The worms and castings are both very marketable... And while I have plenty of worms already, bringing it up to a farming scale would be awesome. Look for Growing Hope to do such a thing in the next year or so-- home grown worm poop!

Posted by: Amanda at 15 april 2006 20:46